Since management are dealing with personal individualities in the group atmosphere, it is improbable to expect that interaction will never break down. Even within the most efficient and effective group atmosphere, problems and situations will occur that will cause an whole malfunction of group interaction.
The malfunction of interaction in the group atmosphere often occurs when believe in and regard are reduced or ignored by personal associates. Failures also happen when serious issue has not been settled within the group.
Another source of interaction malfunction is when associates feel their personal interests are more powerful than the needs and identification of the group. These people are inspired by their personal desires and will do anything to achieve them, including interfering with the group atmosphere.
It is essential for management to identify that interaction breakdowns will happen within the group atmosphere. In the beginning of group growth, interaction problems and breakdowns are more frequent, as people battle to obtain position and maintain power in a new and changing atmosphere. However, in more older and arranged groups, management will find that the group itself will deal with the interaction problem according to its defined limitations, rules and requirements.
Leaders should know that a malfunction in interaction can have long-term consequences on the framework and efficiency of the group. Therefore, it is essential for them to identify potential problems and the symptoms to be able to anticipate problems, such as those discussed below, before they happen.
Loss of Trust and Respect
If management allow problems to fester and lead to a malfunction of group interaction, they will encounter a corresponding malfunction of believe in and regard among associates that can be difficult, if not impossible, to recover. These conditions can be critical to the group and might require the development of a new group to be able to get over them. Damaged believe in requires extended time periods to be reestablished. Leaders need to be conscious of this and take appropriate action to reduce the incident of serious problems that can result in the decrease in believe in and regard among associates.
Hindered Free-Flow of Ideas
Once interaction has split up among associates, management will notice that conversations become more psychological and very subjective rather than objective and actual. When conversations are based on feelings rather than fact, thinking will reduce to the point that there is no free-flow of concepts among associates. This effectively prevents the group procedure until the problems causing the breakdowns are handled.
Intimidation
Leaders who encounter a malfunction of interaction notice that certain associates will attempt to take control of the group procedure, subjugating the group to their personal plans and viewpoints. Once done, these people will use psychological reactions to bully other associates into recognizing their viewpoints. This is where the ties of believe in and regard among associates can be broken. The interaction malfunction ruins the group framework and topics it to the will of one or more associates.
Bias
Once the malfunction of interaction has led to the devastation of the group purchase by one or more associates, a particular prejudice is created that facilitates the person plans of these people. When associates allow the group procedure to be subverted by particular people, they challenge the whole group effort.
Faulty Choice Making
The malfunction of interaction in the group atmosphere certainly leads to defective selection. Specific tendencies that prevent the free-flow of concepts prevent groups from considering all options and alternatives when selection. Consequently, choices are affected by the tendencies of the particular people managing the group. In these conditions, selection and outcomes will be defective.
The malfunction of interaction in the group atmosphere often occurs when believe in and regard are reduced or ignored by personal associates. Failures also happen when serious issue has not been settled within the group.
Another source of interaction malfunction is when associates feel their personal interests are more powerful than the needs and identification of the group. These people are inspired by their personal desires and will do anything to achieve them, including interfering with the group atmosphere.
It is essential for management to identify that interaction breakdowns will happen within the group atmosphere. In the beginning of group growth, interaction problems and breakdowns are more frequent, as people battle to obtain position and maintain power in a new and changing atmosphere. However, in more older and arranged groups, management will find that the group itself will deal with the interaction problem according to its defined limitations, rules and requirements.
Leaders should know that a malfunction in interaction can have long-term consequences on the framework and efficiency of the group. Therefore, it is essential for them to identify potential problems and the symptoms to be able to anticipate problems, such as those discussed below, before they happen.
Loss of Trust and Respect
If management allow problems to fester and lead to a malfunction of group interaction, they will encounter a corresponding malfunction of believe in and regard among associates that can be difficult, if not impossible, to recover. These conditions can be critical to the group and might require the development of a new group to be able to get over them. Damaged believe in requires extended time periods to be reestablished. Leaders need to be conscious of this and take appropriate action to reduce the incident of serious problems that can result in the decrease in believe in and regard among associates.
Hindered Free-Flow of Ideas
Once interaction has split up among associates, management will notice that conversations become more psychological and very subjective rather than objective and actual. When conversations are based on feelings rather than fact, thinking will reduce to the point that there is no free-flow of concepts among associates. This effectively prevents the group procedure until the problems causing the breakdowns are handled.
Intimidation
Leaders who encounter a malfunction of interaction notice that certain associates will attempt to take control of the group procedure, subjugating the group to their personal plans and viewpoints. Once done, these people will use psychological reactions to bully other associates into recognizing their viewpoints. This is where the ties of believe in and regard among associates can be broken. The interaction malfunction ruins the group framework and topics it to the will of one or more associates.
Bias
Once the malfunction of interaction has led to the devastation of the group purchase by one or more associates, a particular prejudice is created that facilitates the person plans of these people. When associates allow the group procedure to be subverted by particular people, they challenge the whole group effort.
Faulty Choice Making
The malfunction of interaction in the group atmosphere certainly leads to defective selection. Specific tendencies that prevent the free-flow of concepts prevent groups from considering all options and alternatives when selection. Consequently, choices are affected by the tendencies of the particular people managing the group. In these conditions, selection and outcomes will be defective.
Team management is like give and take.
ReplyDeleteNo one can whistle a symphony. It takes an orchestra to play it.
- H.E. Luccock